<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Tags/Comments on Emad Alashi</title>
    <link>https://emadashi.com/tags/comments/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Tags/Comments on Emad Alashi</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emadashi.com/tags/comments/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Are code comments important?</title>
      <link>https://emadashi.com/2008/07/are-code-comments-important/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emadashi.com/2008/07/are-code-comments-important/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From the very first day I have heard about &lt;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_development&#34; title=&#34;Agile Development&#34;&gt;Agile development&lt;/a&gt; and I have been hearing things like “&lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.gravityfree.ca/2006/11/myth-of-comments.html&#34; title=&#34;code comments are bad&#34;&gt;code comments are not such a good thing&lt;/a&gt;”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main idea behind that is that the code should be self explanatory; giving functions good names and splitting concerns into different functions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But what about the “why”; why this certain code is written this way? why not do it that way? and this is what I have gone through today!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
